Cases 11 - 20 of 26
United States of America v. Riggs et al
as 4:2018cv00128
Defendant:
Elisha Dawn Riggs, Joseph A Riggs and Ronald Riggs
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America, et al. v. Dickens, et al.
as 4:2017cv00012
Defendant:
William L Dickens and Brenda P. (Dickens) Boone
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Paula F. Nicholls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. King et al
as 5:2016cv00732
Defendant:
Bernice King and Donald King
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Tegeder
as 5:2015cv00661
Defendant:
Daniel Tegeder
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TRANSOU
as 1:2014cv01010
Defendant:
FREDERICK NATHANIEL TRANSOU
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Bull
as 4:2013cv00208
Defendant:
Elinor Bull
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Rewis-Bruey
as 5:2013cv00540
Defendant:
Amber M. Rewis-Bruey
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
XTO Energy Inc. v. Universal Pipeline, L.L.C. et al
as 5:2013cv00106
Plaintiff:
XTO Energy Inc.
Defendant:
Universal Pipeline, L.L.C., Prosperity Funding, Inc. and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Housewright, Inc., et al
as 7:2012cv00277
Defendant:
Housewright, Inc. and Digitaurus, Inc.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. J. Clayton International Inc. et al
as 7:2012cv00184
Defendant:
J. Clayton International Inc., Joan C. Newton and Billy R. Newton
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
