Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Ian Pollard, et al v. Lewis M. Frost, et al
as 17-1818
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ian Pollard
Defendant - Appellee:
Remington Arms Company, LLC, Sporting Goods Properties, Inc. and E.I. Du Pont Nemours and Company
Objector:
Terry Pennington and Rodney Townsend
Objector - Appellant:
Lewis M. Frost and Richard Denney
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellant(s):
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, District of Columbia, State of California and others
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellee(s):
State of Alabama, State of Arkansas, State of Louisiana and others
State of California, et al v. Amgen, Inc, et al
as 10-1954
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, STATE OF DELAWARE, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STATE OF NEW YORK, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AMGEN, INC, INTERNATIONAL NEPHROLOGY NETWORK, AMERISOURCEBERGEN SPECIALTY GROUP and others
Defendant:
WEBMD HEALTH CORP., MEDSCAPE, LLC, WYETH and others
State of Georgia, et al v. Amgen, Inc, et al
as 10-1955
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, STATE OF DELAWARE, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STATE OF NEW MEXICO, STATE OF GEORGIA and KASSIE WESTMORELAND
Defendant - Appellee:
AMGEN, INC, INTERNATIONAL NEPHROLOGY NETWORK, AMERISOURCEBERGEN SPECIALTY GROUP and others
Defendant:
WEBMD HEALTH CORP., MEDSCAPE, LLC, WYETH and others
State of New Mexico v. Ghaffari, et al.
as 1:2009cv00260
Plaintiff:
State of New Mexico and State of New Mexico
Defendant:
Ali M. Ghaffari, Linda Rose Ghaffari, Buena Vista Retirement Center, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Res-Care of New Mexico, Inc. v. State of New Mexico ex rel.
as 1:2008cv00678
Plaintiff:
Res-Care of New Mexico, Inc. and Res-Care of New Mexico, Inc.
Defendant:
State of New Mexico, ex rel., New Mexico Department of Health, New Mexico Department of Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
