Cases 1 - 7 of 7
GUJRAL et al v. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv20581
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE EMERSON and RANBIR GUJRAL
Defendant:
BMW AG, BMW OF NORTH AMERICA LLC, BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AKTIENGELSELLSCHAFT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BALLOU v. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA LLC et al
as 2:2018cv11765
Defendant:
BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT and BMW OF NORTH AMERICA LLC
Plaintiff:
Susan Ballou
Not Classified By Court:
HON. DENNIS M. CAVANAUGH, RET.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
OLIVER et al v. BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT et al
as 2:2017cv12979
Plaintiff:
SHELTON OLIVER , DONNIE BAKER and KHADER MOHIUDDIN
Defendant:
BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT and BMW NORTH AMERICA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Catalano v. BMW of North America, LLC
as 17-3500
Plaintiff - Appellee:
George Catalano, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated
Appellant:
Louis T Somma
Defendant - Appellee:
BMW of North America, LLC, A New Jersey Limited Liability Company and Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft, A Corporation Organized Under the Laws of the Federal Republic of Germany
Defendant:
BMW Manufacturing Company, LLC
GELIS et al v. BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT et al
as 2:2017cv07386
Plaintiff:
ARTEM V. GELIS and BHAWAR PATEL
Defendant:
BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT and BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Catalano v. BMW of North America, LLC et al
as 7:2015cv04889
Plaintiff:
George Catalano
Defendant:
BMW of North America, LLC and Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rennie et al v. Takata Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv24365
Plaintiff:
Diana Rennie and Richard Lee
Defendant:
Takata Corporation, TK Holdings Inc., Highland Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
