Cases 1 - 6 of 6
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 2.451 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS et al
as 7:2020cv00383
Defendant:
Maria De La Luz Fabela De La Cruz a/k/a Maria De La Cruz, Janette Cruz, Gerardo Cruz and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 0.755 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS et al
as 7:2020cv00281
Defendant:
Unknown Heirs of Dario Gonzalez, STARR COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR-COLLECTOR, AMEIDA SALINAS, Rafael Castro Jimenez and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 11.35 Acres of Land, more or less, Situate in Starr County et al
as 7:2019cv00200
Defendant:
11.35 Acres of Land, more or less, Situate in Starr County and Rafael Castro Jimenez
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Florida Southeast Connection, LLC v. 0.577 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Polk County, Florida et al
as 8:2016cv00662
Plaintiff:
Florida Southeast Connection, LLC
Defendant:
Rafael Pastor Fuentes, Marta Fuentes, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0717
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 0.78 ACRES OF LAND, more or less, situated in CAMERON COUNTY, STATE OF TEXAS et al
as 7:2009cv00023
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
0.78 ACRES OF LAND, more or less, situated in CAMERON COUNTY, STATE OF TEXAS, Augusto O. Champion, III, Jorge P. Champion and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC v. .26 acre of permanent easement located in Maricopa County et al
as 2:2007cv02290
Plaintiff:
Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC and Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC
Defendant:
.26 acre of permanent easement located in Maricopa County, .19 acre of temporary construction easement located in Maricopa County, Rafael Madera and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
