Cases 21 - 30 of 115
United States of America v. Mauch
as 8:2016cv00502
Defendant:
Brenda Marie Mauch
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
United States of America v. Eder
as 8:2016cv00495
Defendant:
Richard Paul Eder
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
United States of America v. Borges, Sr. et al
as 8:2016cv00477
Defendant:
Jaynce R. Borges and Andrew A. Borges, Sr.
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
United States of America v. Freemont
as 8:2016cv00476
Defendant:
Cora S. Freemont
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
United States of America v. Wessel
as 8:2016cv00473
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Gregory J. Wessel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
United States of America v Polyansky, et al
as 8:2015cv00253
Defendant:
Applied Card Systems, Inc., Capital One Bank, Midland Funding, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
United States of America v. Rohr et al
as 8:2015cv00171
Defendant:
Ricky E. Rohr and any Unknown Spouse of Rickey E. Rohr
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
United States of America v. Jensen
as 8:2015cv00120
Defendant:
Katherine L. Jensen
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
United States of America v. Jelinek et al
as 8:2015cv00074
Defendant:
City of Yutan, Nebraska and Terri Lynn Jelinek
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
United States of America v. Douglas, II et al
as 8:2015cv00057
Defendant:
Diana F. Carnahan, Denise K. Douglas, William Lee Douglas, II and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
