Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Blue Castle (Cayman) Ltd. v. 30 Fulton Street LLC et al
as 2:2024cv06308
Defendant:
People of the State of New York o/b/o Clerk of the Suffolk County District Court, Clerk of the Suffolk County Traffic & Parking Violations Agency, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Blue Castle (Cayman) Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191 Bank Foreclosure
Li v. Suo et al
as 3:2024cv05055
Defendant:
Roger W. Anderson, Jie Suo and FCI Lender, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Yan-Tao Li
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee v. Prince 26, LLC
as 23-1169
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee, for the Benefit of the Holders of CD 2018-CD7, Mortgage Trust Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2018-CD7, acting by and through its special servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC
Defendant:
New York Department of Finance, New York City Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings and John Doe No. 1 through John Doe No.100, inclusive, the last one hundred names being fictitious and unknown to plaintiff, the persons or parties intended being the tenants, occupants, persons or corporations, if any, having or claiming an interest in
Defendant / Appellant:
Prince 26, LLC, 29 Prince Street Associates LLC, 137 Thompson Street LLC and others
Wilmington Trust, National Association, As Trustee v. 31 Prince Street, LLC
as 23-215
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Wilmington Trust, National Association, As Trustee For The Benefit Of The Registered Holders Of Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2018C44, Commercial Mortgage PassThrough Certificates, Series 20, acting by and through its special servicer, Rialto
Defendant:
New York City Department of Finance, New York City Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings and John Doe No. 1 to John Doe No 100, inclusive, the last one hundred names being fictitious and unknown to plaintiff, the persons or parties intended being the tenants, occupants, persons or corporations, if any, having or claiming an interest in or li
Defendant / Appellant:
31 Prince Street, LLC, Wah Kok Realty Corp. and Edmond Li
Wilmington Trust, National Association, As Trustee For The Benefit Of The Registered Holders Of Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2018-C44, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 20 v. 31 Prince Street, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv05855
Plaintiff:
Wilmington Trust, National Association, As Trustee For The Benefit Of The Registered Holders Of Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2018-C44, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 20
Defendant:
31 Prince Street, LLC, Wah Kok Realty Corp., Edmond Li and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee, for the Benefit of the Holders of CD 2018-CD7, Mortgage Trust Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2018-CD7 v. Prince 26, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv05586
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee, for the Benefit of the Holders of CD 2018-CD7, Mortgage Trust Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2018-CD7
Defendant:
Prince 26, LLC, 29 Prince Street Associates LLC, 137 Thompson Street LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
United States of America v. Yang, Kao et al
as 3:2020cv00223
Defendant:
Kao Yang and Li Zhang
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Li Wang v. Roberto D. Rangel et al
as 5:2019cv02221
Defendant:
Roberto D. Rangel, DOES 1 to 10 inclusive, Tammy Lee Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Li Wang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Zhuofeng Li v. Surinder M. Manaktala et al
as 8:2017cv00055
Defendant:
All Other Occupants, Does, Surinder M. Manaktala and others
Plaintiff:
Zhuofeng Li
Cathay Bank v. Li et al
as 1:2016cv11082
Plaintiff:
Cathay Bank
Defendant:
Wen Hsien Li, David A. Li and Barbara D. Li
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
