Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Wilson-Dye et al v. Chinn-Gary et al
as 3:2017cv00469
Plaintiff:
Sharon Victoria Wilson-Dye and Darrell Dye
Defendant:
Elisa Chinn-Gary, Jeremy B. Wilkins, Brian Moynihan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
SHERMAN et al v. FETNER
as 1:2016cv00137
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER SHERMAN and BRUCE SHERMAN
Defendant:
JOHN P. FETNER, MICHAEL SPICER, DAVID W. NEILL and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
Sutton v. McCrory et al
as 5:2015cv00069
Plaintiff:
Kelly Sutton
Defendant:
Pat McCrory, John W. Smith, Phil Berger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grantham et al v. GraySpencer Inc.
as 5:2011cv00689
Plaintiff:
Darian L. Grantham and Altonia P. Grantham
Defendant:
GraySpencer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
King v. KB Investments & Realty, LLC et al
as 5:2011cv00389
Plaintiff:
Donnie King, Sr.
Defendant:
KB Investments & Realty, LLC , Hutchens, Senter & Britton, P.A. , Elizabeth B. Ells and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al v. Naef et al
as 7:2010cv00197
Defendant:
Christian P. Naef and Kathryn M. Naef
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Substitute Trustee: Shapiro & Ingle, Grady I. Ingle, Elizabeth B. Ells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In the Matter of the Foreclusure by Richard P. McNeely v. Moab Tiara Cherokee Kituwah Nation Chief et al
as 3:2008cv00293
Plaintiff:
In the Matter of the Foreclusure by Richard P. McNeely
Defendant:
Moab Tiara Cherokee Kituwah Nation Chief, Anewa Shapheem Tiari-El Member and Tara Soph Tiari-El
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BROWN v. SAXON MORTGAGE, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv00292
Plaintiff:
DORRELL BROWN
Defendant:
SAXON MORTGAGE, INC. and RICHARD P. MCNEELY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
