Cases 41 - 46 of 46
ULLOA v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. et al
as 1:2010cv00345
Plaintiff:
Richard Enrique Ulloa
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF NEW YORK and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
ULLOA v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. et al
as 1:2010cv00187
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ENRIQUE ULLOA
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF NEW YORK and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
City of Cleveland v. Ameriquest Mortgage Securities, et al
as 09-3608
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CITY OF CLEVELAND
Amicus Curiae:
ADVOCATES FOR BASIC LEGAL EQUALITY, COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION, INC., LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF CLEVELAND and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., BEAR STEARNS & CO., INC., CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS, INC. and others
City of Cleveland v. Ameriquest Mortgage Securities, et al
as 09-3608
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTRYWIDE SECURITIES CORPORATION, GOLDMAN, SACHS & COMPANY, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and others
Amicus Curiae:
LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF CLEVELAND, OHIO MUNICIPAL LEAGUE, LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SOUTHWEST OHIO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CITY OF CLEVELAND, OH
Wilson et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 5:2008cv00851
Plaintiff:
Shawn Wilson and Kristine Wilson
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Fidelity National Field Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
City of Cleveland v. Ameriquest Mortgage Securities, Inc., et al.
as 1:2008cv00139
Petitioner:
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
Plaintiff:
City of Cleveland
Defendant:
Ameriquest Mortgage Securities, Inc., Bear Stearns & Co., Inc., Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Jackie L. Kelly and Patrick R. Kelly
Counter Claimant:
Goldman Sachs Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
