Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Adams et al v. International Paper Company et al
as 1:2017cv00105
Defendant:
International Paper Company, H.O. Weaver & Sons, Inc. and Bay Area Contracting, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Adams, David K. Dock, Mary Roberson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fisher et al v. BP, PLC et al
as 1:2010cv00421
Plaintiff:
James E. Fisher and Kate C. Fisher
Defendant:
BP, PLC, BP Products North America, Inc. , BP America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Riverside Texaco et al v. Occidental Chemical Corporation et al
as 3:2007cv00268
Plaintiff:
Annie R Whiteside, Annie P Thompson, William D Ricks and others
Defendant:
David Ryskoski and Occidental Chemical Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Torts to Land
Abrams et al v. Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corp. et al
as 1:2008cv00068
Plaintiff:
Cleon Abrams, Sr., Cleveland Abrams, Sr., Adell M. Adams and others
Defendant:
Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corp., Ciba-Geigy Corp., Novartis, Ltd., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Abrams et al v. Olin Corporation, et al
as 1:2007cv00622
Plaintiff:
Cleon Abrams, John W. Adams, Jessie J. Adams and others
Defendant:
Olin Corporation, Olin Chloralkali Products Company, Arch Chemicals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Burleson et al v. Peerless Acquisition, LLC
as 5:2007cv00993
Plaintiff:
Raymond Burleson, Raymond Burleson, Ann C Burleson and others
Defendant:
Peerless Acquisition, LLC and Peerless Acquisition, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Torts to Land
Blair et al v. T&K Construction, LLC et al
as 2:2007cv00937
Plaintiff:
Clarence B. Blair, William C. Wood and Wood Family Partnership
Defendant:
T&K Construction, LLC, Sterling Companies, LLC and Cotswold Development, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
