Cases 11 - 20 of 42
ERROR - NOT USED
as 3:2015cv01003
Plaintiff:
United States of America and John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States v. Doe, et al
as 3:2013cv01898
Defendant:
John Doe and Richard Roe
Plaintiff:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. John Doe, et al.
as 3:2013cv01668
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) v. John Doe, et al
as 3:2013cv01661
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v Doe
as 3:2013cv01649
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Smeltzer et al
as 6:2013cv01613
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jeffrey Robert Smeltzer, Richard Roe, Jane Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
United States of America v. John Doe et al
as 3:2013cv01295
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
United States of America Department of Housing and Urban Development v. John Doe et al
as 3:2012cv01963
Plaintiff:
United States of America Department of Housing and Urban Development
Defendant:
John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
United States of America (Small Business Administration) v. John Doe et al
as 3:2012cv01786
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
United States of America v. John Doe et al
as 3:2012cv01090
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
