Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Wexler v. Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc.
as 1:2023cv05957
Plaintiff:
Eve Wexler
Defendant:
Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
Waggoner et al v. Bayview Loan Servicing LLC et al
as 3:2023cv02506
Plaintiff:
Louis Waggoner, aka Louis Waggoner, a/k/a Louis Waggoner Estate and Trust, Subrogee, beneficiary, Lawrence Hill a/k/a Lawrence Hill Estate and Trust, Subrogee, beneficiary, Louis Waggoner and others
Defendant:
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC n/k/a Consumer Loan Servicing, LLC, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS INDENTURE TRUSTEE, SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS INDENTURE TRUSTEE FOR BAYVIEW FINANCIAL REVOLVING ASSET TRUST 2005-EV, I.F. KEY HOLDINGS, INC DBA INTEGRITY FINANCIAL GROUP, a California Stock Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Adams, et al v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv10972
Plaintiff:
Deborah Adams, et al, Deborah Adams, Stephen Altenbuarg and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cross Defendant:
Stephen Carlson
Michael Harkey v. Select Portfolio Servicing, et al
as 18-16011
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL HARKEY
Defendant - Appellee:
SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, U.S. BANK, CSMC MORTGAGE BACKED TRUST 2007-6 and others
Michael Harkey v. Select Portfolio Servicing, et al
as 17-15683
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL HARKEY
Defendant - Appellee:
SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, US BANK NA, CSMC MORTGAGE BACKED TRUST 2007-6 and others
Michael Harkey v. Earl Beutler, et al
as 17-15421
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL HARKEY
Defendant - Appellee:
EARL BEUTLER and EVE BEUTLER
Harkey v. Earl and Eve Beutler Family Trust et al
as 2:2014cv01266
Defendant:
Bryce D. Beutler, Black Knight Financial, LLC, Earl and Eve Beutler Family Trust and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Harkey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
