Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Polidi v. North Carolina State Bar et al
as 1:2016cv01322
Plaintiff:
Richard Polidi
Defendant:
North Carolina State Bar, John Does 1-5 and Jane Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robb et al v. The Kitchen Collection, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2015cv00419
Plaintiff:
Sonia Robb and L. R.
Defendant:
The Kitchen Collection, L.L.C. and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morgan v. John Does 1-2
as 1:2014cv01295
Plaintiff:
Syrita Morgan
Defendant:
John Does 1-2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCray v. Ardelle Associates et al
as 4:2013cv00060
Plaintiff:
Sheryl T. McCray
Defendant:
Ardelle Associates, Infused Solutions, LLC, Jamie Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Fuller et al v. Aliff et al
as 4:2013cv00056
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Fuller and David Krivonak
Defendant:
Hunter Aliff, Kenneth Lamberti , Wayne Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Fussner v. John Does (1-3)
as 1:2012cv00573
Plaintiff:
Christopher Fussner
Defendant:
John Does (1-3)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shipway v. Jerlinski, et al
as 5:2011cv00112
Consol Defendant:
Kate Bowman, John Doe, Harrisonburg Police Department and others
Defendant:
Harrisonburg/Rockingham Department of Social Services and Chloe Jerlinski
Counter Defendant:
Christy Savanick
Plaintiff:
Michelle Ann Shipway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Pinogy Corporation et al v. John Does 1 et al
as 1:2011cv01100
Plaintiff:
Pinogy Corporation and Robert Cook
Defendant:
John Does 1 and John Does 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nedry et al v. Nelson et al
as 1:2011cv00878
Plaintiff:
Jay Nedry and Holt Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
Gunnar Nelson, Kimberly Reed and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mygentlelase, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2010cv01071
Plaintiff:
Mygentlelase, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
