Cases 171 - 180 of 333
Rudy Cordova v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2011cv01911
Plaintiff:
Rudy Cordova
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Sayles v. United States Of America
as 3:2011cv00714
Plaintiff:
Phillip A. Sayles
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Grant v. United States of America, et al
as 2:2011cv00360
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Grant
Defendant:
United States of America , Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Administration San Francisco Veterans Administration Medical Center , Darrell M. McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Pena-Flores v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2011cv00509
Plaintiff:
Luis Pena-Flores
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Robert Lazo and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Carlos Franklin Bell v. Alex Kozinsky et al
as 2:2011cv00153
Defendant:
AO Fed Ct, AQMD, ARB and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Franklin Bell
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. United States Postal Service
as 3:2010cv02230
Plaintiff:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
McIntyre v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection et al
as 3:2010cv02045
Plaintiff:
Vicki Anne McIntyre
Defendant:
U.S. Customs and Border Protection , John Murphy and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abo-Shihata v. Holder
as 3:2010cv02015
Plaintiff:
Abdo Abo-Shihata
Defendant:
Ericn H. Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Priscilla Medina v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2010cv04816
Plaintiff:
Priscilla Medina
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Perez v. Department of the Treasury et al
as 1:2010cv01082
Plaintiff:
Sylvia T. Perez
Defendant:
Department of the Treasury, California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board (CUIAB) and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
