Cases 1 - 10 of 15
SCHOLL v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
as 2:2022cv01837
Plaintiff:
JOHN SCHOLL
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 8131 Federal Employee's Compensation Act (FECA)
MCDADE v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2019cv01031
Plaintiff:
JOHN MCDADE
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
HALEY v. BUFFALO & PITTSBURGH RAILROAD, INC.
as 1:2015cv00241
Plaintiff:
JOHN HALEY
Defendant:
BUFFALO & PITTSBURGH RAILROAD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
CANELLA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv00160
Plaintiff:
JOHN CANELLA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
CROSS v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv04170
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. CROSS
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
YOPE v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2012cv01147
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. YOPE
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
DESTEFANO v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv05160
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. DESTEFANO
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
MCTEAGUE v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
as 2:2010cv02467
Plaintiff:
JOHN P. MCTEAGUE
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
SCHROTH v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (SEPTA)
as 2:2009cv02671
Plaintiff:
JOHN SCHROTH
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (SEPTA)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
TATUM v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY
as 2:2008cv00399
Plaintiff:
JOHN TATUM
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
