Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Dant v. Bertucci Contracting Co., L.L.C., et al
as 2:2016cv16131
Plaintiff:
Michael Dant
Defendant:
Bertucci Contracting Co., L.L.C., Bertucci Marine, L.L.C. and Crosby Tugs, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104
O'Connell v. Crosby's Fish & Shrimp Co Inc
as 2:2016cv03531
Plaintiff:
John J O'Connell
Defendant:
Crosby's Fish & Shrimp Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Randle v. Crosby Tugs, L.L.C.
as 2:2016cv15429
Plaintiff:
David J. Randle
Defendant:
Crosby Tugs, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Norman v. Crosby Tugs, LLC, et al
as 2:2015cv06878
Plaintiff:
Rusty Norman
Defendant:
Crosby Tugs LLC, Crosby Marine Transportation, LLC and Crosby Offshore Marine Services
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104
Matthiews et al v. Crosby Tugs, LLC
as 2:2015cv05985
Plaintiff:
Troy Matthiews and Tracey Matthiews
Defendant:
Crosby Tugs, LLC
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Melissa Means, et al v. CCL, et al
as 15-13280
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross Appellee:
MARTHA ACKLEY, KENDRA STROUD, LENORA L. BROOKS and others
Defendant - Appellee-Cross Appellant:
CARNIVAL CORPORATION, in personam d.b.a. Carnival Cruise Lines
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK SPAGNOLETTI
Moore v. Crosby Tugs, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2015cv00487
Plaintiff:
Lebarron Moore
Defendant:
Crosby Tugs, L.L.C. and Alliance Offshore, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Crosby v. White Tail Oilfield Services, L.L.C.
as 2:2015cv00390
Plaintiff:
Trevor Crosby
Defendant:
White Tail Oilfield Services, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104
Bowman v. Crosby Tugs, L.L.C.
as 2:2014cv02524
Plaintiff:
Desmond Bowman
Defendant:
Crosby Tugs, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Dominguez v. Crosby Tugs, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv02135
Defendant:
Crosby Tugs, LLC and Crosby Marine Transportation, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jorge Dominguez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104 Marine Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
