Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Amos v. American Commercial Lines L L C
as 6:2013cv00636
Plaintiff:
Joseph Amos
Defendant:
American Commercial Lines L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Amos v. MSC Crociere SpA
as 0:2013cv60232
Plaintiff:
Rohmaine Amos
Defendant:
MSC Crociere SpA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Amos Chauvin v. Antill Pipeline Const Co., Inc, et al
as 11-30025
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMOS CHAUVIN, and wife
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTILL PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC, ANTILL PIPELINE COMPANY, INCORPORATED, ANTILL PIPELINE CORPORATION and others
Chauvin et al v. Antill Pipeline Construction Company, Inc et al
as 2:2009cv05923
Plaintiff:
Amos Chauvin and Katina Chauvin
Defendant:
Antill Pipeline Construction Company, Inc, Antill Pipeline Company, Inc, Antill Pipeline Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104 Marine Personal Injury
Chauvin et al v. Antill Pipeline Construction Company, Inc et al
as 4:2009cv02274
Plaintiff:
Amos Chauvin and Katina Chauvin
Defendant:
Antill Pipeline Construction Company, Inc, Antill Pipeline Company, Inc, Antill Pipeline Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Greenes Energy Group L L C v. Haynes et al
as 6:2007cv00049
Plaintiff:
Greenes Energy Group L L C and Greenes Energy Group L L C
Defendant:
Marlon J Haynes, Sr, Marlon J Haynes, Sr, Johnny White, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 1331 General Maritime/OCSLA
In Re: Ingram Barge, et al
as 06-30705
(null):
In re: INGRAM BARGE CO, As Owner of the ING 4727, Petitioning for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability
Third Party Plaintiff - Appellant:
PARFAIT FAMILY, ASHTON R O'DWYER, JR., TAMMY AMOS and others
Third Party Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, by and through its agencies and instrumentalities, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, UNITED STATES COAST GUARD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
