Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Gabbert v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00394
Petitioner:
Janice Gabbert
Respondent:
of America United States
Jackson Creek Marine, LLC v. State Highway Administration of the State of Maryland
as 2:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
Jackson Creek Marine, LLC and IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT OF JACKSON CREEK MARINE, LLC AS OWNER OF THE TUG JACQUELINE A
Defendant:
State Highway Administration of the State of Maryland and NONE
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 741 Shipping
Gutierrez v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2022cv00556
Plaintiff:
Anthony Gutierrez
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Marine Hydraulics International, LLC doing business as MHI SHIP REPAIR AND SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Papania v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00527
Plaintiff:
Matthew Papania
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688 Jones Act
Hornsby v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv00427
Plaintiff:
Douglas I Hornsby
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 0901 Longshoreman Habor Workers Compensation Act
Davis v. Ocean Ships. Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00151
Plaintiff:
Edgar Bristol Davis
Defendant:
Ocean Ships. Inc. and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Wright v. United States of America
as 2:2019cv00589
Plaintiff:
Ms. Sheltia Wright and Sheltia Wright
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Trute v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv00349
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
Craig J. Trute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Robles v. United States of America
as 2:2019cv00111
Plaintiff:
Rey F. Robles
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Robles v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv00110
Plaintiff:
Rey F. Robles
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
