Cases 21 - 30 of 110
Brock v. Miller et al
as 3:2019cv00882
Defendant:
JAB Trucking, Fictitious Defendants A, B, C, D, E, and F and Wilson Miller
Plaintiff:
Robert Brock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Byrd v. Taylor et al
as 2:2019cv00184
Defendant:
Travis E. Taylor, Cal Cartage Transportation Express, LLC and NFI Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ladean Byrd
Intervenor:
Mississippi Public Entity WC Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Buchanan v. Jones et al
as 3:2019cv00223
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Buchanan
Defendant:
Thomas E. Jones and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Randlett et al v. Gomes et al
as 1:2019cv00552
Defendant:
Joseph E. Gomes and John and Jane Does A, B, and C
Plaintiff:
Ruth Randlett and David Randlett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sagely et al v. Pat Salmon & Sons, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00150
Defendant:
Pat Salmon & Sons, Inc. and Earl E. Patterson
Plaintiff:
Gordon Sagely and Rosanna Sagely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rasdon et al v. E 3 Trucking, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00100
Defendant:
E3 Trucking Inc., Robert Aghajani and E 3 Trucking, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jim Raines and Tammy Rasdon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rollins et al v. Fitts et al
as 1:2018cv00198
Plaintiff:
Jason Rollins and Eric Powell
Defendant:
Edward Fitts and E & J Tours, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gibson et al v. Weaver et al
as 3:2018cv00683
Defendant:
Craig Bell, J & E Partnership, LP, Jeffrey W. Weaver and others
Plaintiff:
Leanna Gibson and I'zden Gibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Sears, Roebuck and Company et al
as 2:2018cv00170
Defendant:
Carl E. Purdum, Jr. and Sears, Roebuck and Company
Plaintiff:
Ambrea Banks Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson v. Bonner et al
as 3:2018cv00514
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Salathe Gas Company, LLC and Mark T. Bonner
Plaintiff:
Craig E. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
