Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Garcia, et al v. United States of America
as 4:2015cv00088
Plaintiff:
Carlos Garcia, Jr. and Edna Garcia
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Degraffenriedt v. United States of America
as 5:2014cv00218
Plaintiff:
Charles Degraffenriedt
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
McDonald v. Whitney et al
as 4:2012cv00093
Plaintiff:
Tommie Junior McDonald
Defendant:
Mark Alan Whitney and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
McDonald v. Whitney et al
as 7:2012cv00199
Plaintiff:
Tommie Junior McDonald
Defendant:
Mark Alan Whitney and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Hartley v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2011cv00485
Plaintiff:
Andrew Chase Hartley
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Kolodziejczyk
as 7:2009cv00174
Plaintiff:
Mary Louise Kolodziejczyk
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
MCDANIEL et al v. COBB
as 1:2009cv00567
Plaintiff:
JARED ROBERT MCDANIEL and ADAM SAUNDERS MCDANIEL
Defendant:
CHARLES MILTON COBB, JR. and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
MCDANIEL, et al, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2009cv00124
Plaintiff:
JERRY ROBERT MCDANIEL, JARED ROBERT MCDANIEL and ADAM SAUNDERS MCDANIEL
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Progressive Southeastern Insurance Company v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2008cv00479
Plaintiff:
Progressive Southeastern Insurance Company
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Castro v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2008cv00033
Plaintiff:
Mario Alberto Castro
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
