Cases 1 - 6 of 6
HIGH POINT PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY et al
as 1:2022cv06825
Plaintiff:
HIGH POINT PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY and HIGH POINT SAFETY & INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY, JOHN DOE INSURANCE COMPANY 1--10, JOHN DOE 1-3 (A fictitious name) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
HIGH POINT PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv06825
Plaintiff:
HIGH POINT PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY and HIGH POINT SAFETY & INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY, JOHN DOE INSURANCE COMPANY 1--10, JOHN DOE 1-3 (A fictitious name) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
ELEZOVIC v. MOTOR COACH INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS ELEZOVIC
Defendant:
MOTOR COACH INDUSTRIES, INC., PETER PAN BUS LINES, INC., WABCO HOLDINGS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA v. GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY et al
as 1:2020cv05285
Defendant:
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY, APTIV PLC, ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA and JEFFREY BURGESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
MILLS v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR COMPANY et al
as 3:2007cv05983
Plaintiff:
ROGER MILLS
Defendant:
AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR COMPANY, ABC COMPANIES 1-10, DEF COMPANIES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
RAMOS et al v. MAAX-KSD CORPORATION, et al
as 2:2007cv02257
Plaintiff:
ARTURO RAMOS and CHERYL RAMOS
Defendant:
MAXD-KSD CORPORATION, ABC COMPANIES 1-10 and JOHN DOES 1-10
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
MAAX-KSD CORPORATION
ThirdParty Defendant:
UNITEX GLASS
Counter Claimant:
UNITEX GLASS
Counter Defendant:
MAAX-KSD CORPORATION, ABC COMPANIES 1-10 and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
