Cases 1 - 8 of 8
SPRUCE STREET PROPERTIES LTD et al v. CARLYLE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2024cv00544
Plaintiff:
SPRUCE STREET PROPERTIES LTD, DAVID W. BISHOFF, E.V. BISHOFF, COMPANY and others
Defendant:
CARLYLE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ESQUIRE DAVID M. BELCZYK, ESQUIRE DAVID I. KELCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Tierney v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04487
Plaintiff:
David M. Tierney
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. and GENERAL EQUIPMENT COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TIERNEY v. THE HOME DEPOT, INC., et al
as 5:2021cv04487
Plaintiff:
David M. Tierney
Defendant:
THE HOME DEPOT, INC. and GENERAL EQUIPMENT CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHRISTIANA MALL, LLC v. SHAFKOWITZ et al
as 2:2014cv03984
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIANA MALL, LLC
Defendant:
DAVID M. SHAFKOWITZ and LAW OFFICES OF DAVID M. SHAFKOWITZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOLLEY v. KOLECKI et al
as 2:2012cv04904
Plaintiff:
RONALD HOLLEY
Defendant:
PAUL KOLECKI, THOMAS JEFFERSON HOSPITAL, RICHARD J. HAMILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MAXWELL et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv01023
Plaintiff:
VERNON MAXWELL , BRODERICK JONES , KENDALL WILLIAMS and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE , NFL PROPERTIES LLC , RIDDELL INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CONSUMER PROTECTION CORPORATION et al v. DIGITAL SPEED COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv01783
Plaintiff:
CONSUMER PROTECTION CORPORATION, PETER STROJNIK, P.C. and DAVID M. DEPINTO
Defendant:
DIGITAL SPEED COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ADAM H. PASTERNACK and ABC DEFENDANTS 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SMITH v. JONES, GREGG, CREEHAN & GERACE, LLP. et al
as 2:2008cv00365
Plaintiff:
DONALD E. SMITH
Defendant:
JONES, GREGG, CREEHAN & GERACE, LLP., RICHARD B. SANDOW, DAVID M. HUNTLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
