Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Ledesma v. Gary Railway Company et al
as 2:2023cv00322
Plaintiff:
Frank Ledesma
Defendant:
Gary Railway Company, United States Steel Corporation and Terry Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
ALVIS v. HOOK-SUPERX, LLC.
as 3:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
FRANK E. ALVIS and FRANK ALVIS
Defendant:
HOOK-SUPERX, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
MILLSAP et al v. MENARD, INC.
as 3:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
LISA MILLSAP and FRANK MILLSAP
Defendant:
MENARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Baltes et al v. White County et al
as 4:2020cv00067
Plaintiff:
Talaina Pinkerton, Darcy Slade, Jeanne Franks and others
Defendant:
Mark Helmsn, White County Sheriff Patrick E. Shafer, White County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ORI v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
as 1:2020cv02109
Defendant:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff:
FRANK ORI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KNEZ v. LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC
as 1:2018cv03224
Defendant:
LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC
Plaintiff:
FRANK KNEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Hall et al v. Souder et al
as 1:2018cv00210
Plaintiff:
Clifford Hall and Kathy Hall
Defendant:
Mark Souder, United States Postal Service, Nester Construction and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ZINT et al v. MCDONALD'S CORPORATION et al
as 3:2017cv00092
Defendant:
ARCHLAND PROPERTY I, LLC, MANN ENTRPRISES-INDIANA, LLC and MCDONALD'S CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
BETTY C. ZINT and FRANK D. ZINT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Shamma v. El-Sharif
as 1:2017cv00223
Plaintiff:
Frank Shamma
Defendant:
Seif El-Sharif
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller et al v. Howard et al
as 3:2016cv00886
Defendant:
Jerimey R Howard and Larry K Franks
Estate_plaintiff:
Shadrick D Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
