Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Hendrix v. Marshall & Melhorn, LLC
as 3:2023cv01181
Plaintiff:
Mark Hendrix and Kaitlyn Theil
Defendant:
Marshall & Melhorn, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Thiel v. Marshall & Melhorn, LLC
as 3:2023cv01222
Plaintiff:
Kaitlyn Thiel
Defendant:
Marshall & Melhorn, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
In re: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company C-8 Personal Injury Litigation
as 2:2013md02433
Plaintiff:
Anita Yerby, Roberta Sue Daugherty-Hall, Kathryn J. Post and others
Interested Party:
National Geographic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Marshall v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2020cv01165
Defendant:
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Plaintiff:
Jon Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Greer v. Elliott et al
as 1:2019op46117
Defendant:
Par Pharmaceutical Inc., Par Pharmaceutical Companies Inc., Endo International PLC and others
Plaintiff:
Julia Greer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marshall v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Company
as 2:2018cv00141
Plaintiff:
Nancy Marshall
Defendant:
E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marshall et al v. Best Buy Stores, L.P. et al
as 1:2017cv01557
Plaintiff:
Sean Marshall and Shauna Marshall
Defendant:
Best Buy Stores, L.P. , John Doe and Jim Doe Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marshall v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02145
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Marshall
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Logston v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02053
Plaintiff:
Marshall M. Logston
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marshall v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00267
Plaintiff:
Georgia G. Marshall
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
