Other Personal Injury Cases filed in West Virginia
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Smith v. Popish et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00129
Plaintiff: Raymond Smith
Defendant: Eric Popish and City Of Weirton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Miller et al
as 2:2015cv00059
Plaintiff: Aaron Turner
Defendant: William M. Miller , Raymond K. Lemora, III and Christopher Siler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whittington v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02989
Plaintiff: Charles Raymond Whittington
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jumper v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02247
Plaintiff: Harold Raymond Jumper
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stewart v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01123
Plaintiff: Raymond Stewart
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wamsley v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00882
Plaintiff: Raymond A. Wamsley
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young, et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00304
Plaintiff: Raymond Young and Rhonda Young
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bonecutter v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv30441
Plaintiff: Raymond Bonecutter
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shutts v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv27382
Plaintiff: Raymond C. Shutts
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coss v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv25174
Plaintiff: Raymond Ralph Coss
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?