Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Brooks v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (SEPTA) et al
as 2:2020cv00143
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (SEPTA) and JOHN DOES 1-10 (fictitious designations)
Plaintiff:
Wendell Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BROOKS v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (SEPTA) et al
as 3:2020cv00143
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10 and SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (SEPTA)
Plaintiff:
WENDELL BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JOHNSON v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (SEPTA) et al
as 2:2016cv03599
Plaintiff:
KIRQ JOHNSON
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (SEPTA) and NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WELH v. MANFREDI TRANSPORTATION, CO., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv02873
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH WELH
Defendant:
MANFREDI TRANSPORTATION, CO., INC., CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Richard Deweese v. Natl RR Passenger, et al
as 09-1569
Plaintiff:
RICHARD DEWEESE
Defendant - Appellee:
NATL RR PASSENGER and COMM PA DEPT TRANSP
Defendant - Appellant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY ("SEPTA")
Brett Birdwell v. Natl RR Passenger
as 08-2263
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRETT BIRDWELL and JEFFREY KLEIN
Defendant - Appellant:
NATL RR PASSENGER
Defendant:
NORFOLK S CORP
Amicus - Amicus Appellant:
ASSOC OF AMER RR, ENERGY ASSN OF PA, NATL ASSN OF MFG and others
Jeffrey Klein, et al v. National Railroad Passenger Co, et al
as 08-2264
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRETT BIRDWELL and JEFFREY KLEIN
Defendant - Appellant:
NORFOLK S CORP
Defendant:
NATL RR PASSENGER
Amicus - Amicus Appellant:
ENERGY ASSN OF PA, NATL ASSN OF MFG and SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY ("SEPTA")
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
