Cases 11 - 20 of 1,128
Pete v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv04490
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Carol Pete
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robertson v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv04478
Plaintiff:
Carol Robertson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lacey et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04406
Plaintiff:
Carol Lacey and Ronald Lacey
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rasmussen v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv04292
Plaintiff:
Carol Rasmussen and John Rasmussen
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sherman et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv04016
Plaintiff:
Carol Sherman and Jerry Sherman
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03872
Plaintiff:
Carol Miller
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03869
Plaintiff:
Carol Brown
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reeves et al v. Boston Scientific Corp. et al
as 2:2017cv03744
Plaintiff:
Karen Reeves , Retha Clememts , Shereel Connolly and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific, Corp. and Doe Manufacturers 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Toweson et al v. Boston Scientific Corp. et al
as 2:2017cv03740
Plaintiff:
Susan Toweson , Rose Sykes , Dawn Vowiell and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp. and Doe Manufacturers 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vigen et al v. Boston Scientific Corp. et al
as 2:2017cv03742
Plaintiff:
Sue Vigen , Tina Fitzpatrick , Janet Garrett and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp. and Doe Manufacturers 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
