Personal Injury- Product Liability Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 95
Arnold et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv01239
Plaintiff: Ronald Hugh Arnold, John Matthew Abboud, Frank T Abel and others
Defendant: 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Arnold et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00286
Plaintiff: Ronald Hugh Arnold, John Matthew Abboud, Frank T Abel and others
Defendant: 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
JAMES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04291
Plaintiff: JOHN EDWARD JAMES, JR.
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CARROLL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01082
Plaintiff: JOHN EDWARD CARROLL
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kumpf v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00539
Plaintiff: John Edward Kumpf
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Neill v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2022pq02562
Special Master: Randi Ellis
Plaintiff: John Edward Neill
Defendant: Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Chevron USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
v. Neill et al
as 3:2022pq02558
Defendant: Mr. John Edward Neill, Sygenta AG, Sygenta Crop Protection, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
v. Neill
as 3:2022pq02557
Defendant: Mr. John Edward Neill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LUSK v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13070
Plaintiff: JOHN EDWARD LUSK and JOHN E LUSK, JR
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROSS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11765
Plaintiff: JOHN EDWARD ROSS
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?