Cases 11 - 20 of 1,164
Kunysz v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Carley L. Kunysz
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
v. Argiro et al
as 7:2024cv00340
Defendant:
John Argiro and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Argiro v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
John Argiro
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dunne v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 7:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
Dennis Dunne
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Flores v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Amanda Flores
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Talley et al v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Seth Talley and Lyda Talley
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mcdermott v. Corelle Brands, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
MARK MCDERMOTT
Defendant:
CORELLE BRANDS, LLC and INSTANT BRANDS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harris et al v. Elutia Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Lisa Harris and Oral Duane Harris, Jr.
Defendant:
Elutia Inc., Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., Spinalgraft Technologies, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chesson v. Worthington Industries Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Erik D Chesson
Defendant:
Worthington Industries Inc., Worthington Cylinder Corporation, Worthington Enterprises,Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Baker v. Corelle Brands LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Samantha Baker
Defendant:
Corelle Brands LLC, Instant Brands, Inc. and Instant Brands, Inc. f/k/a Double Insight, Inc. d/b/a Instant Pot Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
