Cases 21 - 30 of 71
Russell et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv28532
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Russell and Jeffery Russell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richardson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv27205
Plaintiff:
Susan Richardson , Tracy Robinson , Jeff Robinson and others
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson , Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carlisle et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv24033
Plaintiff:
Cathy Carlisle and Jeffery Carlisle
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jefferies et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv20762
Plaintiff:
Lori Hewitt Jefferies and Ronald Marshall Jefferies
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Auten et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv16089
Plaintiff:
Dawn Auten and Jeffery Auten
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC, Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boston et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv12466
Plaintiff:
Debra L. Boston and Jeffery Boston
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fitt et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv11545
Plaintiff:
Melynda Fitt and Jeffery Fitt
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wooten et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv11049
Plaintiff:
Kristi Wooten and Jeffery Davis
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keckler et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv11099
Plaintiff:
Lisa Keckler and Jeffery Keckler
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chartier et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv10905
Plaintiff:
Karen Chartier and Jeffery Chartier
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
