Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Cupp v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv31449
Plaintiff:
Lena M. Cupp
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cupp v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv27032
Plaintiff:
Ruth A. Cupp
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cupp et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv23117
Plaintiff:
Patrica Cupp and Leland Cupp
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cupp et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv07399
Plaintiff:
Brenda Cupp and Garnet Cupp
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cupp et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv07210
Plaintiff:
Patricia May Cupp and Leland Cupp
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McClesky et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv33758
Plaintiff:
Hayley McClesky , Nereida Cintron , Pamela Adams and others
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McClesky et al v. CR Bard Inc
as 5:2013cv00849
Plaintiff:
Hayley McClesky , Nereida Cintron , Pamela Adams and others
Defendant:
CR Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Cupp v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 2:2013cv21226
Plaintiff:
Ortha Cupp
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cupp v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv17352
Plaintiff:
Rachel N. Cupp
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cupp et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv14214
Plaintiff:
Sandra Lee Cupp and Kenneth Ray Cupp
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
