Cases 31 - 40 of 238
Dees v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2022pq02374
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Bobby Malcolm Dees
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dees v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00560
Plaintiff:
Bobby Malcolm Dees
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG. and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CRAWFORD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14565
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DEE CRAWFORD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12593
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY DEE THOMAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv03065
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DEE MARTIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOCKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv68185
Plaintiff:
DEE P HOCKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MONSON v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv01524
Plaintiff:
AMY DEE MONSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOCKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv60927
Plaintiff:
DEE HOCKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Monson v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv02195
Plaintiff:
Amy Dee Monson
Defendant:
3M Company, 3M Occupational Safety, LLC, Aearo Holding, LLC and others
DEES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv54452
Plaintiff:
JEREMY ALLEN DEES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
