Cases 31 - 40 of 420
Rogers et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv08022
Plaintiff:
Kelly Rogers and David Rogers
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Proffer et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv07789
Plaintiff:
Linda L. Proffer and Roger B. Proffer, Sr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Apple et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv07243
Plaintiff:
Patricia Apple and Roger A. Barnett, II
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nelson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06417
Plaintiff:
Beverly K. Nelson and Roger M. Nelson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06243
Plaintiff:
Kerri E. Brown and Roger William Brown
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv05698
Plaintiff:
Charlotte K. Davis and Roger H. Davis , Jr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Golden et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv05136
Plaintiff:
Sandra Golden and Roger Golden
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peeples et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv04919
Plaintiff:
Janet Peeples and Roger Peeples
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Howell et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv04873
Plaintiff:
Patricia Howell and Roger Howell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv04812
Plaintiff:
Mary Rogers
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
