Cases 41 - 50 of 351
Stephens v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv13195
Plaintiff:
Anisha Stephens
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cirella et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv13179
Plaintiff:
Lori Ann Cirella and Stephen Cirella
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carlson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv12955
Plaintiff:
Carole Carlson and Stephen Albertson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McGeorge et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv12413
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann McGeorge and John Stephen McGeorge
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boch et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv12419
Plaintiff:
Jean Ellen Boch and Stephen Boch
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fritzmann et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv12412
Plaintiff:
Mary Fritzmann, Stephen Fritzmann and Mary E. Fritzmann
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gebhart et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv12123
Plaintiff:
Barbara Gebhart and Stephen Gebhart
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ames et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv11427
Plaintiff:
Susan E. Ames and Stephen R. Ames
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv11429
Plaintiff:
Darla D. Williams and Stephen Williams
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newkirk et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv10360
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Newkirk and Stephen Newkirk
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
