Cases 61 - 70 of 187
Carter v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv26670
Plaintiff:
Sislyn Carter
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Makar et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv25377
Plaintiff:
Vivian Makar , Graciela Martinez , Teresa Sellinger and others
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Sofradim Production SAS, Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kobata et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv25368
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Kobata , Ingeborg Sautter , Emma Smith and others
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Sofradim Production SAS, Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carter et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv24663
Plaintiff:
Hope Alma Carter and Arlen Joe Carter
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carter v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv24689
Plaintiff:
Kimi Carter
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carter et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv24430
Plaintiff:
Twyanna Carter and Anthony Carter
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carter v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv23228
Plaintiff:
Dayle Carter
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carter v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv23608
Plaintiff:
Patricia Carter
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carter v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv23275
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Diane Carter
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hinklin et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv22900
Plaintiff:
Gentle Carter Hinklin and Eddie Hinklin
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
