Cases 61 - 70 of 420
Davis et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv13898
Plaintiff:
Linda Davis and Roger Davis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv13724
Plaintiff:
Susan Rogers and Ronnie Rogers
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fleming et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv13719
Plaintiff:
Ellen Fleming and Roger Fleming
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv13600
Plaintiff:
Lela Rogers
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brosie et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv13135
Plaintiff:
Martha J Brosie and Roger A. Brosie
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wolfe et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv12707
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Wolfe and Roger Wolfe
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans et al v. Sofradim Production SAS
as 2:2015cv12609
Plaintiff:
Mildred Evans and Roger Evans, Sr.
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mims et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv12185
Plaintiff:
Joann Mims and Roger Mims
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bloebaum et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv12237
Plaintiff:
Deborah Bloebaum and Roger Bloebaum
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whitworth et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv12278
Plaintiff:
Joan M. Whitworth and Roger Whitworth
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
