Cases 81 - 90 of 167
Peters et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00936
Plaintiff:
Estelle Peters and Fritz Peters
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Babcock et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00555
Plaintiff:
Sherry H. Babcock and Peter Babcock
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lucas et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00381
Plaintiff:
Betty Lucas and Peter Lucas
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Connolly et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv33774
Plaintiff:
Colleen Connolly and Peter Connolly
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gagne et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv33589
Plaintiff:
Janine A. Gagne and Peter James Gagne
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rothenbach et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv33487
Plaintiff:
Diana Rothenbach and Peter Allen Rothenbach
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moses et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2013cv32974
Plaintiff:
Megan Moses , Michelle Dishon , Janet Hedges and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peters v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv32503
Plaintiff:
Lori Peters
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Muhlhauser et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv32435
Plaintiff:
Toni Muhlhauser and Peter Muhlhauser
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierson et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv32376
Plaintiff:
Janice Pierson , Janet Plasse , Karen Coleman and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
