Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Clay v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv03842
Plaintiff:
Theresa J. Clay
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03712
Plaintiff:
Sherry Jones and Danny Clay Jones
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Neece et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03337
Plaintiff:
Olivia Neece , Jocelyn Aldridge , Theresa Anderson and others
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems, LLC , Astora Women's Health LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clay v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv10572
Plaintiff:
Elnora Clay
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clay et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv02942
Plaintiff:
Tamara Clay and Donald Clay
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffin-Clay et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv01045
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Griffin-Clay and Kevin L. Clay, Sr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clay v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv14710
Plaintiff:
Lamarna M. Clay
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Guess et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv11511
Plaintiff:
Janet Guess and Marvin Clay Guess
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clay et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv08652
Plaintiff:
Brenda J. Clay and Dennis L. Clay
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nash et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02328
Plaintiff:
Melissa Nash and Clay Nash
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
