Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Yasnowski et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2018cv02146
Plaintiff:
Bernice Yasnowski and John A Yasnowski
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hale v. Smith & Nephew Inc
as 1:2021cv00639
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc
Plaintiff:
John J Hale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407
Goode v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2020cv03396
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Goode
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Romp et al v. Smith & Nephew Inc
as 1:2020cv03062
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc
Plaintiff:
John Romp and Sharon Romp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017md02775
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01356
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Hilda Campbell and John Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. The Dow Chemical Company et al
as 8:2020cv00988
Defendant:
BP Lubricants USA, Inc., The Dow Chemical Company and John Does 1-25
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Olds et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2019cv02808
Defendant:
SMITH & NEPHEW BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION and Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carla M Olds and John G Olds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. MTD Products Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01592
Defendant:
MTD Consumer Group Inc., MTD Holdings Inc, John Doe and/or John Doe, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
Lenander v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2019cv01239
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John R Lenander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
