Cases 1 - 10 of 3,568
Ehninger v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01877
Plaintiff:
Catherine E. Ehninger
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02592
Plaintiff:
James E. Smith, III
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hill, Jr. v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02497
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Hill, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Muench v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65577
Plaintiff:
Jessica E. Muench
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Loya v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65547
Plaintiff:
Bianca E. Loya and Blanca E. Loya
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gunnoe v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65541
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Gunnoe
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02383
Plaintiff:
Craig E. Johnson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shannon v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02394
Plaintiff:
Tracey E Shannon
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pearl v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02333
Plaintiff:
Jason E. Pearl
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ash v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02310
Plaintiff:
Clyde E. Ash, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
