Cases 1 - 6 of 6
ROBINSON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv21904
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY ROBINSON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FINCH et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv15155
Plaintiff:
DARRELL FINCH and ESTATE OF SHIRLEY ROBINSON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC. and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROBINSON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv04062
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY ROBINSON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2015cv05447
Plaintiff:
Shirley Robinson
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc et al
as 6:2013cv01941
Plaintiff:
Marvin Robinson and Shirley Robinson
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Joseph et al v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp20280
Plaintiff:
John Joseph and Shirley Robinson
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc , Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
