Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Hornof, et al v. United States, et al
as 23-1761
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAROSLAV HORNOF, a resident and citizen of the Czech Republic, DAMIR KORDIC, a resident and citizen of Croatia and LUKAS ZAK, a resident and citizen of the Slovak Republic
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, US COAST GUARD, US DEPT. OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Interested Party:
CHALOS & CO. P.C.
Defendant:
JOHN D. CASHMAN, an employee of the US Department of Justice, RICHARD UDEL, an employer of the US Department of Justice, MICHAEL A. FAZIO, Commander, First Coast Guard District of the United States Coast Guard and others
Brian Tackett, et al v. Montana Dept. of Public Health and Human Services, et al
as 22-35326
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN TACKETT, individually, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Robbie Ann Tackett, and as Guardian of Minor Children G.T. and G.T.
Plaintiff:
KAITLYN OWEN
Defendant / Appellee:
MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, LOGAN HEALTH, WILLIAM T. HIGHFILL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Dodson et al v. Sanofi S.A et al
as 9:2020cv80252
Plaintiff:
Thelma Myles, Director Ronnie Lawrence, Antoine Dodson and others
Defendant:
Chattem Inc., GlaxoSmithKline, LLC, Sanofi-Aventis US LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DELGADO v. SAM'S WEST, INC. D/B/A SAM'S CLUB et al
as 3:2019cv21320
Plaintiff:
TANYA DELGADO and VICTOR DELGADO
Defendant:
SAM'S WEST, INC., JOHN/JANE DOE, ABC CORPORATION, AND XYZ PARTNERSHIP 101-200, REPRESENTING ONE OR MORE FICTITIOUS PERSONS OR ENTITIES CONSISTING OF DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, PRINCIPALS, PARTNERS, BOARDS, BOARD MEMBERS OR R, JOHN/JANE DOE, ABC CORPORATION, AND XYZ PARTNERSHIP 1-100, REPRESENTING ONE OR MORE FICTITIOUS INDIVIDUALS OR ENTITIES, INDIVIDUALLY, JOINTLY, AND SEVERALLY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
