Cases 31 - 40 of 47
DUKE v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv78156
Plaintiff:
RODGER D. DUKE
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., GARLOCK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DUKE v. MONSANTO COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv79212
Plaintiff:
JAMES DUKE
Defendant:
MONSANTO COMPANY, GARLOCK, INC., GULF BELTING & GASKET CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DUKE et al v. A.M. LOCKETT & CO., ET AL.
as 2:2008cv76971
Plaintiff:
CHARLES R. DUKE and CHARLES R. DUKE
Defendant:
A.M. LOCKETT & COMPANY, LTD., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ALLIED EQUIPMENT, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DUKES v. MISSISSIPPI RUBBER & SPECIALTY, et al
as 2:2008cv77291
Plaintiff:
JOHN E. DUKES
Defendant:
MISSISSIPPI RUBBER & SPECIALTY, A-BEST CORP., DURAMETALLIC CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DUKES v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv74472
Plaintiff:
MARY THERESA DUKES
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DUKES v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv76432
Plaintiff:
GEORGE DUKES
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DUKES v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv74471
Plaintiff:
HOWARD DUKES
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SHERRILL, ET AL. v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv75572
Plaintiff:
DONALD DUKE SHERRILL
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DUKE v. ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv71439
Plaintiff:
LEE S. DUKE
Defendant:
ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC., AEROQUUIP INTERNATIONAL, INC., AEROQUIP CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Duke v. American Standard, Inc., et al
as 2:2008cv09306
Defendant:
American Standard, Inc., The Budd Company, Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Milton A. Duke
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
