Cases 81 - 90 of 90
BOLTON v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2008cv84756
Plaintiff:
ROSEMARY BOLTON
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BANKS v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2008cv84746
Plaintiff:
LIZZIE BANKS
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CONWAY v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2008cv84777
Plaintiff:
SAMMY CONWAY
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BLOUNT v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2008cv84754
Plaintiff:
JOEL BLOUNT
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BROWDER v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2008cv84762
Plaintiff:
CHARLES W. BROWDER
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BURKE v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2008cv84768
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH BURKE
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ALLEN v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2008cv84740
Plaintiff:
ANN ALLEN
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ALLEN v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2008cv84741
Plaintiff:
EARL ALLEN
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Samara et al v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv11136
Plaintiff:
Randolf G. Samara and Janice Samara
Defendant:
Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Buffalo Pumps, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
KUMMER v. ALLIED SIGNAL, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv63079
Plaintiff:
MARY P KUMMER and MARY P KUMMER
Defendant:
ALLIED SIGNAL, INC., AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., AMERICAN PACKING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
