Cases 1 - 10 of 116
Holmes et al v. Bossier, Jr. et al
as 2:2020cv00880
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
J. Melton Garrett and Albert L. Bossier, Jr.
Defendant:
Komp Equipment Company, Inc., McCarty Corporation, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Anthoni O'Niel, Booker W Holmes, Michael Watson and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Claims Resolution Management Corporation and Uniroyal, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Hopeman Brothers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In Re: Asbestos Product
as 13-2000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CATHRYN HOLME, Special Administrator for the Estate of Darrell T. Holme Sr
Defendant - Appellee:
AC & S INC, CHICAGO FIRE BRICK, CSR LTD and others
HOLM v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv56888
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL H. HOLM
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HOLMES v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv56769
Plaintiff:
CHARLES M. HOLMES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HOLMES v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv68656
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN V. HOLMES
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HOLMES v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv57435
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HOLMES
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HOLM v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv57247
Plaintiff:
CARL N. HOLM
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HOLMES v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv54908
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN V. HOLMES
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HOLMES v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv58654
Plaintiff:
L A HOLMES
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HOLMES v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv59569
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. HOLMES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
