Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Glass v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2018cv00077
Plaintiff:
W. Douglas Glass
Defendant:
E.I. DuPont De Nemours Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Navistar, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Murphy et al v. Rohm and Haas Company et al
as 2:2015cv05566
Defendant:
Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. , Certainteed Corporation , General Electric Company and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Lanoue Murphy , Irvin D. Murphy , Kelly Murphy Ricks and others
Third_party_plaintiff:
Georgia-Pacific LLC
Third_party_defendant:
Celotex Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
MATTHEWS v. SEA-LAND SERVICE, INC.
as 2:2011cv58841
Plaintiff:
IRVIN MATTHEWS
Defendant:
SEA-LAND SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
IRVINE v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv58789
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J IRVINE
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
DOWLEARN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv55902
Plaintiff:
IRVIN L. DOWLEARN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MATHEWS v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv54623
Plaintiff:
IRVIN MATHEWS
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
FARVE v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv54708
Plaintiff:
IRVIN E FARVE
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
FAVRE v. ACANDS, INC.
as 5:2011cv54284
Plaintiff:
IRVIN E. FAVRE
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MATTHEWS v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv57295
Plaintiff:
IRVIN MATTHEWS
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GLASS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv44133
Plaintiff:
IRVIN GLASS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
