Cases 101 - 110 of 1,266
Nguyen v. Prehired Recruiting, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv02894
Plaintiff:
Nghia Nguyen and Nghia Nathan Nguyen
Defendant:
Prehired Recruiting, LLC, Prehired, LLC and Joshua Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Seay et al v. Vega et al
as 1:2022cv03368
Plaintiff:
Tamika Seay and Melvin Seay
Defendant:
Andrea David Vega and Robert V. Rodatus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Winenger v. Lowry
as 2:2022cv00135
Plaintiff:
Robert Winenger
Defendant:
April Martin Lowry
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7431 IRS: Unauthorized Disclosure of Return & Return Info
Gilbert v. US Department of Education
as 1:2022cv02908
Plaintiff:
Selena Gilbert
Defendant:
US Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Meshechok v. Meshechok et al
as 1:2022cv02185
Plaintiff:
Renate Ursula Meshechok
Defendant:
Robert V.M. Meshechok, Alex Meshechok, Sharon C. Duvall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Muldrow v. EZ E-File Tax Preparers, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00554
Plaintiff:
Angelica Ivana Muldrow
Defendant:
EZ E-File Tax Preparers, Inc. and Ajeenah Crittendon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Darden v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 1:2022cv02642
Plaintiff:
Carlos Darden
Defendant:
Navy Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Drolshagen v. Days Diesel Trucks LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
Skye Drolshagen
Defendant:
Days Diesel Trucks LLC and Bryce Day an individual doing business as Days Diesel Trucks
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 32701 Motor Vehicle Odometer
Jones v. Laine et al
as 2:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
Camilla Jones
Defendant:
Laine, Loggins, Cantrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jones v. Gainesville
as 2:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
Camilla Jones
Defendant:
Gainesville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
