Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Lundahl v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 2:2013cv00241
Plaintiff:
Holli Lundahl
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company , Michael Johnson , Snell & Wilmer and others
Movant:
National Registered Agents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 3:2011cv01061
Plaintiff:
Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
In Re: New Motor Veh, et al, et al
as 07-1990
Plaintiff:
BARRY COHEN, SARAH EPSTEIN and PHINEAS A ADLER
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SURI SKORSKI, ELI ELBAZ and SEAN GREGOR AND ASSOCIATES, CO., L.P.A.
Defendant - Appellee:
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, General Motors Corporation, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR, CO. INC., and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL AUTOMOBILE, BASS FINEBURG, Bass Fineburg Leasing Inc., GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, General Motors Acceptance Corp. and others
SKORSKI et al v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv00007
Plaintiff:
SURI SKORSKI and ELI ELBAZ
Defendant:
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION , FORD MOTOR COMPANY , AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR COMPANY INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Andrew Brown's Drug Store, Inc. et al v. Abbott Labs et al
as 1:2004cv00157
Plaintiff:
Andrew Brown's Drug Store, Inc., Mary Anne Anzalone doing business as Fino's Pharmacy, Blue Bell Pharmacy, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Abbott Labs, American Cyanamid Company, American Home Products Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Altamont Phar Inc et al v. Abbott Labs et al
as 1:2002cv02121
Plaintiff:
Roth-Matteo Drug Store, Inc., Bandy Drugs, Bowman's Pharmacy South, Inc. doing business as Bowman's Southtowne Pharmacy and others
Defendant:
American Cyanamid Company, Upjohn Co., Ciba-Geigy Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
