Cases 21 - 25 of 25
In re: Pharmaceutical, et al
as 08-1055
Not Classified By Court:
SHIRLEY GELLER, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 537 TRUST FUNDS, BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MASSACHUSETTS and SHEET METAL WORKERS UNION NATIONAL HEALTH FUND
Defendant / Appellant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Defendant / Appellee:
GLAXOWELLCOME, INC.
In Re: Pharmaceutical, et al
as 08-1055
:
SHIRLEY GELLER, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
:
UNITED STATES, COUNTY OF ULSTER, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 537 TRUST FUNDS, BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF MASSACHUSETTS and SHEET METAL WORKERS UNION NATIONAL HEALTH FUND
Defendant - Appellant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
GLAXOWELLCOME, INC.
In Re: Pharmaceutical, et al
as 07-2664
Not Classified By Court:
SHIRLEY GELLER, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEMRA JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE
Defendant:
BEDFORD LABORATORIES, EISAI, INC., GENSIA SICOR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Appellee:
GLAXO WELLCOME PLC and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORP.
Lee et al v. Oh et al
as 2:2007cv01691
Plaintiff:
Gyeong Hyeon Lee, Gyeong Hyeon Lee, Woul Eun Yoo and others
Defendant:
Korean Air Lines Co Ltd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Park et al v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd.
as 1:2007cv05370
Plaintiff:
Young Keun Park, Myung Hwan Rim, Yeong Seon Cho and others
Defendant:
Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
