Cases 61 - 70 of 92
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. ELECTION SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, INC.
as 1:2010cv00380
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF COLORADO and others
Defendant:
ELECTION SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. TICKETMASTER ENTERTAINMENT, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv00139
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
Defendant:
TICKETMASTER ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and LIVE NATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
RICHARDSON et al v. AZKO NOBEL, INC.
as 1:2009cv02112
Defendant:
MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORPORATION, CHINOOK GLOBAL LIMITED, EVONIK DEGUSSA GMBH and others
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, KIRK CHAFFEE, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
State of Florida, Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs, v. Champion Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02321
Plaintiff:
State of Florida, Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs,, State of Florida, Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs,, State of Florida, Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs, and others
Defendant:
Champion Laboratories, Inc., Purolator Filters NA, LLC, Honeywell International Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
In Re: Pharmaceutical Case, et al
as 09-1196
:
SHIRLEY GELLER, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA, TWIN CITIES BAKERY WORKERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, CARPENTERS & MILLWRI, Carpenters & Millwrights of Houston and Vicinity Welfare Trust Fund, Board of Trustees, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LEROY TOWNSEND, Individually and on behalf of other similarly situated and others
:
UNITED STATES, COUNTY OF ULSTER, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
M. JOYCE HOWE
Defendant - Appellant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
GLAXOWELLCOME, INC. and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
State of Florida et al v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 1:2008cv00155
Plaintiff:
State of Florida, State of Arizona, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Fournier Industrie et Sante' and Laboratoires Fournier SA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
In Re: Pharmaceutical
as 08-1190
:
SHIRLEY GELLER, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
:
UNITED STATES, COUNTY OF ULSTER, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD BEAN, LARRY YOUNG, THERESE SHEPLEY and others
In Re: Pharmaceutical
as 08-1190
Not Classified By Court:
SHIRLEY GELLER, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HAROLD BEAN, LARRY YOUNG, THERESE SHEPLEY and others
In Re: Pharmaceutica, et al, et al
as 08-8001
:
SHIRLEY GELLER, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
:
UNITED STATES, COUNTY OF ULSTER, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
LARRY YOUNG, THERESE SHEPLEY, M. JOYCE HOWE and others
Petitioner:
DONALD E. HAVILAND, JR.
Defendant - Respondent:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, JOHNSON & JOHNSON INTERNATIONAL, WARRICK PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE and GLAXOWELLCOME, INC.
Respondent:
STEVE W. BERMAN
Pierson v. Orlando Regional Healthcare Systems, Inc. et al
as 8:2008cv00183
Plaintiff:
Raymond H. Pierson, III, Raymond H. Pierson, III, Raymond H. Pierson, III and others
Defendant:
Orlando Regional Healthcare Systems, Inc., Phillip G. Spiegel, Roger Murbach and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
