Cases 1 - 10 of 111
D'Onofrio General Contractors Corp. v. Sika AG et al
as 1:2024cv03255
Plaintiff:
D'Onofrio General Contractors Corp
Defendant:
Sika AG, Sika Corporation, Chryso, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 sc Sherman-Clayton Act
Purcell et al v. Continental Aktiengesellschaft et al
as 1:2024cv00938
Plaintiff:
Daniel Purcell, Luke Cuddy and Elizabeth Twitchell
Defendant:
Continental Aktiengesellschaft, Continental Tire The Americas, LLC, Compagnie Generale Des Etablissements and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Novak v. Continental Aktiengesellschaft et al
as 1:2024cv01202
Plaintiff:
Frank Novak
Defendant:
Continental Aktiengesellschaft, Continental Tire the Americas, LLC, Compagnie Generale des Etablissements and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
D'Onofrio General Contractors Corp. v. Sika AG et al
as 1:2024cv00783
Plaintiff:
D'Onofrio General Contractors Corp.
Defendant:
Sika AG, Sika Corporation, Chryso, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Dennis et al v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al
as 1:2016cv06496
Plaintiff:
Dennis, FrontPoint Asian Event Driven Fund, L.P., Sonterra Capital Master Fund, Ltd. and others
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Co, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Australia, BNP Paribas, Australia Branch and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
In Re: Auction Houses Anti., et al v. , et al
as 1:2000cv00648
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Robert A. Daly, Jr., Ronald Black, Vicki Haberman and others
Claimant:
N.B.S. Diamonds, Inc., Seymour Stein, Louis Glick Diamond Corp. d/b/a Louis Glick & Co. and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Sotheby's Inc., Christopher M. Davidge, Abraham & Associates and others
Defendant:
Fataihi Company of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, A. Alfred Taubman, Swicorp, S.A. and others
Interested Party:
United States Of America and The United States of America
Intervenor Plaintiff:
J&J Lubrano, Giovanna Terruzzi, Pamela Alper and others
Petitioner:
Boies, Schiller & Flexner, L.L.P.
Plaintiff:
Herbert Black
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Inform Inc. v. Google LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01530
Plaintiff:
Inform Inc.
Defendant:
Google LLC, Google Inc,, Alphabet Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
IN RE MEXICAN GOVERNMENT BONDS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 1:2018cv02830
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement System and Electrical Workers Pension Fund Local 103, I.B.E.W.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Boston Retirement System, United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-State Pension Fund, Government Employees' Retirement System of the Virgin Islands and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Edmar Financial Company, LLC et al v. Currenex, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06598
Plaintiff:
Edmar Financial Company, LLC and Irish Blue & Gold, Inc.,
Defendant:
Currenex, Inc., Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, HC Technologies, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Precision Associates, Inc et al v. Panalpina World Transport (Holding) LTD. et al
as 1:2008cv00042
Defendant:
Spedlogswiss, Morrison Express Corporation (USA), Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
Frances Wright, Gabby Gottlieb doing business as Ego Communications/Cantrade, Dan Weatherly doing business as Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sunward International Inc., David Howell Product Design Inc., d/b/a David Howell & Company, Mary Elle Fashions, d/b/a Meridian Electric and others
Intervenor:
Sony Electronics, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Dell, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Garden City Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
